Higher Local Taxes Thanks to Gov. Kasich and Rep. Sprague


Higher local taxes are in your future thanks to Governor Kasich and Representative Sprague.  The elimination of the Estate Tax will cost the City of Findlay about .8 million dollars a year in lost revenue.  That is about 3.3 % of the city’s annual budget.  It may not seem like much, but when you add to that the loss of other sources of state funding and the roll back of the quarter percent emergency city income tax, the city of Findlay is facing a $4.9 million shortfall for the year 2013.

Rep. Robert Sprague and The Courier acknowledge that local taxes are bound to go up, but they believe that trading state taxes for local taxes is a good deal for the citizens of Ohio and Findlay.  I fail to see how trading one tax for another makes Ohio more competitive.

For a Governor that has his sights set on a presidential run in 2016, cutting the Estate Tax is all gain and no pain.  Governor Kasich can stick a nice feather in his cap by cutting the Estate Tax, long the whipping boy of the Republican Party.  Then Kasich will let local governments and local tax payers make up the loss of revenue.  Cutting the Ohio Estate Tax will play well with the Republican base at the national level, but where does it leave the Ohio tax payer?

I would ask; are Ohio’s Republican lawmakers using this budget crisis not only to shift the burden from the State to the Local level, but more importantly to shift the total of our state and local revenues to a less progressive and a more regressive tax system?   Elimination of the Estate Tax is the keystone in the Republican plan to shift a greater tax burden from the wealthy to working families.

In an environment where the state government is pinching local government at both ends with decreased funding and increased unfunded mandates to close the state’s budget gap, cutting the Estate Tax and placing a high tax burden on working families, in favor of the wealthy, seems irresponsible and wholly unfair.

Courier Editorial “Unbalanced”: http://www.thecourier.com/opinion/editoral/2012/Mar/23/ar_ed_032312.asp?d=032312,2012,Mar,23&c=e_0

Courier Editorial “Balancing Act”: http://www.thecourier.com/opinion/editoral/2011/Jun/21/ar_ed_062111.asp?d=062111,2011,Jun,21&c=e_0

Advertisements

One Response to Higher Local Taxes Thanks to Gov. Kasich and Rep. Sprague

  1. oxcamel says:

    Unfortunately, this seems to be a new trick for politicians of both parties. Put money in your left hand and take it from the right.

    In Columbus, to meet budget shortfalls, they cut the funding of the Public Library System. The system is consistently one of the top public libraries in the country and last year was chosen as the best system in the country. So the city passed a levy to make up the shortfall. Then they cut the yard waste pickup from weekly, to just a few weeks in the spring and fall. Drop off service was still available. After public outcry from the loss of the service, the city said they could add the service back if the city income tax was raised. Again, it was passed.

    I also get a laugh over the tax cuts for business that will be made up by closing loopholes. So, we will cut your taxes by 10% and then close the loopholes so your taxes stay the same. What’s the point?

    People want to cut taxes, balance the budget and keep all the services at the current standards. Doesn’t work. The states are passing the cuts down to the local levels and the areas that have money pass new taxes and the poorer areas lose services. See the problem?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: